Loudachris
AI Search, Without The Sales Pitch

LLM SEO: What Actually Works in AI Search

LLM SEO means making your site easy for ChatGPT, Gemini and Google's AI Overviews to find, understand and cite. It rests on the same work as SEO. I check every tactic against the documentation, so you know what's worth paying for and how to test any claim yourself.

  • Every tactic checked against Google's own documentation
  • A 5-minute method to test any AI visibility claim yourself
  • A free AI search audit with its scope published
“Chris has been incredibly responsive and clear with explanations and information. He's helping us unravel years of confusion and we're excited to move forward with confidence from this point on.”
Nichola Hall, Google review

170+ 5-star Google reviews across Australia

Chris Lourenco, Director of Loudachris Digital Marketing

Work directly with Chris

Meet Chris →

The position in a sentence

AEO, GEO and LLM SEO are SEO under new names, and Google's own guide says so. I offer a free measurement with a published scope, and any work it finds sits inside ordinary SEO.

Changed: how answers are displayed
Changed: how you measure
Changed: how queries are phrased
Unchanged: what you actually do
Sourced → Testable → Yours

What is LLM SEO?

LLM SEO is the work of making a website easy for AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews to find, understand and cite. Google's own guidance says it's still SEO: a page needs to be indexed and eligible for a snippet, with no extra technical requirements, no llms.txt file and no special schema. What changed is presentation, measurement and phrasing. Loudachris publishes the scope of a free AI search audit and folds any resulting work into Website SEO from $1,500+GST a month, with no separate AI fee.

Jump to: the tactic table · the 5-minute method · the free audit

By Chris Lourenco, Director, Loudachris Digital Marketing · Last updated 15 October 2026

The Teardown

Every tactic being sold, and what the documentation says.

These are the 10 items that turn up most often in AI search proposals. Each row links to the primary source, so you can read the wording yourself before you sign anything. The table names tactics only, never the firms selling them.

Sold asWhat the documentation saysSource
✕llms.txt fileGoogle Search ignores these files, so creating one neither helps nor harms your Google visibilityGoogle: optimising for generative AI
✕AI-specific schema vocabularyNo special schema.org structured data is needed to appear in AI featuresGoogle: AI features and your website
✕Content chunking "for AI"No requirement to break content into tiny piecesGoogle: optimising for generative AI
✕Writing specifically for AINot needed. Write for your human audienceGoogle: optimising for generative AI
✕Chasing "mentions" across the webInauthentic mentions aren't as helpful as they might seemGoogle: optimising for generative AI
✕AEO or GEO as a separate disciplineOptimising for generative AI search is still SEOGoogle: optimising for generative AI
✕Tools claiming Google's internal AI dataNo third-party tool has access to Google's ranking or AI systemsGoogle: optimising for generative AI
✕Speakable schema as an AI leverLimited availability, news publishers onlyGoogle: Speakable
✕HowTo rich resultsRetired from Google SearchGoogle Search Central blog
✕Guaranteed AI citationsIndexing and serving aren't guaranteedGoogle: AI features and your website

Sources checked 15 October 2026. If any of them change, this table changes with them and the date at the top of the page moves.

There's a fair reading of some of these. Google itself says it's fine to keep an llms.txt file for other services, and clear section headings are good writing on their own merits. My concern is how they're priced, as a new discipline on a monthly retainer with an implied outcome. Charge only for what the documentation supports and the invoice looks very different.

Google's own answer

How to appear in Google's AI Overviews.

Google's guide to AI features and your website gives the rule in 1 line. To be shown as a supporting link in AI Overviews or AI Mode, a page must be indexed and eligible to appear in Google Search with a snippet. In Google's words, “There are no additional technical requirements.”

The same guide lists the SEO fundamentals that keep working for AI features. Each of them is ordinary, checkable work:

  • Crawling allowed in robots.txt, and by your CDN or hosting
  • Internal links that make your content easy to find
  • A good page experience on every device
  • Important content available as text
  • Images and video that support the text
  • Structured data that matches the visible page
  • An up-to-date Business Profile and Merchant Center listing

Google's guide to optimising for generative AI features adds how the selection works. Its AI features retrieve pages from the Search index using its core ranking systems, and may run a “query fan-out” of related searches across subtopics. A page that answers the main question and the questions around it gives those systems more to draw on. The same guide warns that creating separate pages for every variation of a question, mainly to influence rankings or AI answers, breaks its scaled content abuse policy.

Clicks from AI Overviews and AI Mode are counted in Search Console's Performance report, so you can measure them with the account you already own.

What genuinely changed.

Something real did happen. Here are the 3 shifts that hold up to scrutiny.

How answers are displayed

A generated summary now sits above the list of links. For a question with a factual answer, the reader can finish without clicking. For a question that ends in someone being hired, the click still happens, because a summary can't quote a price for your job or answer the phone. That split, informational versus commercial, decides how much any of this matters to you.

How you measure

A visit that started inside an assistant often arrives without a referrer you can segment cleanly, and a generated summary has no fixed position to report. The picture is blurrier, and measurement discipline sharpens it: track enquiries and calls per query family, and label the estimates as estimates.

How queries are phrased

People type fragments into a search box and whole sentences into an assistant. A 2-word query now carries a suburb, a constraint and a budget. Pages that state plainly what you do, where you do it, what it involves and roughly what it costs answer more of that sentence.

The Unchanged Part

What stayed the same: the work itself.

Presentation moved. Measurement moved. Phrasing moved. The task list stayed put. Everything below was the job before any of this arrived and it's still the job now, which is why I sell 1 retainer for it. Put plainly: this is SEO.

Being crawlable and indexed

Pages have to be fetched, rendered and indexed before anything can quote them. Clean canonicals, unblocked resources and pages inside the index are still the first job on any proposal.

Genuinely useful, specific content

A page that states what the service includes, which areas it covers, what it involves and roughly what it costs gives a summary something concrete to draw on. Google calls this non-commodity content.

Accurate, consistent business data

A single version of your name, address, phone number, hours and service list across your site and your Google Business Profile. Consistency makes your business easy to describe accurately.

Real reviews from real customers

Volume, recency, and the actual words customers use. Reviews are the raw material any summary about a local business reaches for.

Standard schema.org markup

Honest markup describing the organisation, the services and the pages, matching what the page shows. It's been part of competent technical SEO for years and is still worth doing.

Clear internal links

Links between your own pages make your content easy to find, and Google lists them among the SEO fundamentals that keep working for AI features.

Should you block AI crawlers?

Blocking is a choice about 2 different jobs. Search crawlers fetch your pages so an assistant can show and link them. Training crawlers collect content to train AI models. Each one can be allowed or refused separately in robots.txt.

  • Google.Googlebot's robots.txt rules control Search, AI Overviews and AI Mode included. Google-Extended is the control for AI training and grounding in some of Google's other systems. Source
  • ChatGPT. OAI-SearchBot surfaces sites in ChatGPT search, and GPTBot collects content for training. OpenAI says a site can allow the first and refuse the second. Source
  • Perplexity.PerplexityBot surfaces and links websites in Perplexity's search results, and Perplexity says it isn't used to train AI foundation models. Source

If you want to be found and cited, keep the search crawlers allowed, and check your CDN and hosting settings too, because Google lists them alongside robots.txt. Whether to allow training crawlers is a decision about your content, and it's yours to make. Checking which crawlers can reach your pages is part of the technical work in my Website SEO.

Verify It Yourself

The 5-minute method: check any claim on this page yourself.

Take nobody's word for this, mine included. This takes 5 minutes, needs no software, and produces a number you own.

1

Write the question the way a customer would say it

Their sentence, with the suburb, the constraint and the urgency in it, because that's how people type to an assistant. Start with a single question.

2

Open a brand new session, signed out if the tool allows it

Chat history and account personalisation both change what comes back. A fresh session gives you a clean reading.

3

Ask it, and write down what you get

Record 2 things only: which businesses are named, and which URLs are cited. The named list and the source list are the parts that matter.

4

Repeat the identical prompt at least 3 times, fresh session each time

Same wording, new session. Then, if you have 60 seconds spare, run it once on a second assistant. You now have a small sample instead of an anecdote.

5

Count, then conclude

Your result is a fraction: named in 2 of 4 runs, cited in 1 of 4. That fraction is the honest output. Re-run it before you spend money on the strength of it.

Now point the same method at a sales pitch

When a provider shows you a screenshot of an AI answer naming a business, ask 3 questions. How many times was the prompt run? Were the sessions fresh? And can you re-run the identical prompt right now, together? A claim that holds up to all 3 is worth listening to.

The Variance Principle

The same prompt, 3 times, can give 3 different answers.

Generated answers are produced fresh each time, and the result varies with how the question was phrased, what else was in the session, which model version is serving you, and what got retrieved at that moment.

So a single check measures 1 moment, whichever way it falls. A provider who says you're missing from AI answers, or shows you an answer naming your business, needs repeated runs to back it. The unit of evidence is a frequency across those runs.

A single run is 1 data point

Treat it the way you'd treat asking 1 person on a street corner for the best cafe in town: interesting, and a reason to ask more people before you budget against it.

Frequency is the honest metric

Named in 3 of 10 runs is a statement you can defend, act on, and re-measure next quarter. Insist on that shape and most of the noise in this market clears.

Comparisons need identical conditions

Before and after only means something when the prompt, the session state and the assistant are held constant, with the same number of runs on both sides.

Where the numbers on this page come from

Every claim here is sourced to documentation or testable with the method above. I haven't published a study, so the page carries no percentages, growth curves or client outcomes from AI visibility work. If I publish numbers here, they'll come with the prompt, the run count, the dates and the assistant used.

What I offer: a diagnostic with a published scope.

The useful product here is measurement: a read on whether there's anything worth fixing, run the way the method above describes, with the scope published before you ask for it. My audit runs 12 agreed prompts 3 times each across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, and it's free. Whatever it turns up is ordinary SEO work.

Free

The AI search audit

Repeated prompts, recorded frequencies, and a plain read on whether any of this is costing you enquiries. The full audit scope is published, so you know what arrives.

From $1,500+GST/month

If there is work to do

Our published SEO pricing, month to month, no lock-in. Website SEO is $1,500, $2,500 or $4,000+GST a month, whether or not AI comes up.

$0

AI surcharge

A single line item, because the work is shared. If a quote carries a separate AI line, ask which deliverable it buys that standard SEO doesn't already include.

Request the audit and I'll agree the prompts with you first, then send the written report and the raw response log. Prefer to talk it through? Call me.

“Really easy to deal and always happy to help with any queries we have had since. Highly recommend to anyone looking for SEO services.”
Chris Brooks, Google review
“The world of SEO and digital marketing can be confusing. Chris from Loudachris Digital Marketing managed to simplify it and make it easy to understand. … If you are someone that finds SEO hard to understand, just talk to Chris.”
Joel E V, Google review

The rest of this silo argues the same case from different angles: the AI search visibility hub, the case against answer engine optimisation and generative engine optimisation as separate products, what to ask an AI search agency, and how any of it applies here in Adelaide.

Read This Before You Spend Anything

Who can leave this until later.

The best first step in AI search is often a simpler piece of SEO. If any of these 5 is still on your list, start there, because it'll move revenue further and cost you less.

Get your key pages indexed

If Search Console shows key service pages outside the index, start there. Indexing comes before every sentence on this page.

Complete your Google Business Profile

Full categories, service areas, the right phone number and a steady flow of reviews. For a local business it's the highest-yield work available, and it's the same data any summary about you draws on.

Build search as a channel first

If most enquiries come from referrals and repeat customers, grow the search channel before worrying about how it's presented.

Convert the traffic you already have

Turning more of today's visitors into calls is cheaper, faster and fully within your control.

Write down your top 10 commercial queries

The method above starts with the question a customer would ask. With the list in hand, you can run it and decide whether there's anything to fix.

All 5 done? Run the method, get your fraction, and bring it to the free audit. I'll run it independently and tell you whether the 2 sets of numbers agree.

Who wrote this

Chris Lourenco, Director, Loudachris Digital Marketing

Loudachris is based at 21-22 Greenhill Road, Wayville SA 5034, and I work with Australian service businesses on SEO, Google Ads and the websites that support them. I wrote this page because I kept being asked to quote for AEO and GEO packages, and that work already sits inside the SEO retainer. Everything here is sourced or testable, and anything I couldn't source has been left out.

Found a source that has since changed, or a point you'd argue? Send it through the contact page and I'll update the page and its date.

ABN 73 630 143 190Wayville SA 5034Last updated: 15 October 2026

Straight answers about LLM SEO and AI search.

Is LLM SEO a real discipline, or is it just SEO?
It's SEO. The label is new and the deliverables are familiar. Every input an AI answer can draw on was found by crawling the open web, reading your business data, or retrieving a page a search index already knew about. That's the same surface SEO has always worked on. A useful test for any proposal: ask which deliverable would be dropped if AI assistants disappeared tomorrow.
What's the difference between LLM SEO and GEO?
They're different names for the same practice. LLM SEO, GEO (generative engine optimisation) and AEO (answer engine optimisation) all describe work aimed at being found and cited in AI answers. Google's own guide says optimising for generative AI search is still SEO. I cover the GEO label itself on my generative engine optimisation page.
Does SEO still matter for AI search?
Yes, because AI answers are assembled from sources that have to be found first. Google says its AI features rely on its core Search ranking systems to retrieve pages from its index. A page that's crawlable, indexed, fast and clear gives those systems something to retrieve, so the SEO underneath is what AI visibility is built on.
Do I need an llms.txt file?
Not for Google. Google's guide says Google Search ignores llms.txt files, so creating one neither helps nor harms your visibility there. I don't charge for one, and this site doesn't have one.
Is there a schema type that AI systems reward?
No special schema.org markup is needed for AI features. Standard markup that accurately describes your organisation, services, location and pages is worth doing on its own merits, and it's been part of competent technical SEO for years. Google recommends it for rich results and asks that it matches the visible text on the page.
Should I chunk my content or rewrite it for AI?
Google says there's no requirement to break content into tiny pieces, and no need to write in a special way for AI. Clear headings, short paragraphs and a direct answer near the top are good writing for people, and that's what Google asks for. The person who clicks through from an AI answer is the one who decides whether to call you.
Can anyone guarantee my business gets cited in ChatGPT or an AI Overview?
No. Google states that indexing and serving aren't guaranteed. Citations also vary by phrasing, session and model version. What a provider can commit to is the work on your site and an honest measurement, repeated over time, of how often you're named.
How do I check whether my business appears in AI answers?
Run the same question several times, in a fresh session each time, and record how many of those runs name you. The same prompt can return different businesses on different runs, so a single check proves little either way. The 5-minute method on this page walks through it, and the result is a frequency out of the number of runs you did.
What does your AI search audit cost?
Nothing. The audit is free and the scope is published, so you can see exactly what gets measured before you ask for it. See the audit scope. If it finds work worth doing, that work sits inside my Website SEO from $1,500+GST a month, month to month, with no separate AI fee.

Check your own AI search visibility, free.

Run the 5-minute method yourself, then have me run the audit independently and compare. The audit is free, the scope is published, and you get a straight answer either way.

Call 0403 454 199

Start at the AI search visibility hub or read the SEO pricing guide.

CallBook Free Audit